<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple does it again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/apple-does-it-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/apple-does-it-again/</link>
	<description>selling my soul, but keeping a copy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:26:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/apple-does-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2004 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthurthefourth.com/?p=43#comment-17</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Took them long enough.&lt;/a&gt; Yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger" rel="nofollow">Took them long enough.</a> Yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/apple-does-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 02:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthurthefourth.com/?p=43#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Forgot to mention Ichat AV.  I&#039;m doing full duplex audio chat with my friend right now using my imic and the built-in microphone on my powerbook.  This shit is unbelievable.  I think I can sum up my problems with Panther by saying that Apple doesn&#039;t seem to be thinking different, they&#039;re just thinking better.  And, yes, I AM complaining about that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgot to mention Ichat AV.  I&#8217;m doing full duplex audio chat with my friend right now using my imic and the built-in microphone on my powerbook.  This shit is unbelievable.  I think I can sum up my problems with Panther by saying that Apple doesn&#8217;t seem to be thinking different, they&#8217;re just thinking better.  And, yes, I AM complaining about that. <img src='http://arthurthefourth.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echillri</title>
		<link>http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/apple-does-it-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>echillri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 16:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthurthefourth.com/?p=43#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Mostly I agree with you, except for the &quot;at least it&#039;s something different&quot; part. Most alternative UIs I&#039;ve seen have been hugely silly exercises in poncing about prettily while not getting any work done.

Your suggestions for Expos&#233; are good, and I think even practicable. It needs to be said, though, that any widespread revolutions in GUIs will be the result of evolution, not revolution. As a society we&#039;re just as attached and just as dependent on the static window model as on gasoline-powered engines. Sure, some geeks like multiple desktops in Linux, and it may be objectively better, but you can say the same thing about hydrogen cars. Also, consider that while we may be tired of static windows, most of the world is still getting the hang of them. There&#039;s still plenty of usability issues to be worked through before the model is mature and ready to be supplanted.

Perhaps a good analogy is the bike; a fancy Cannondale today looks very little like the first bikes, but I can still look at either and know how to start working with it immediately, because I learned how to ride &#039;a&#039; bike, and therefore by extension any bike. That kind of universal generalized expertise is very valuable and discarded at our peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly I agree with you, except for the &#8220;at least it&#8217;s something different&#8221; part. Most alternative UIs I&#8217;ve seen have been hugely silly exercises in poncing about prettily while not getting any work done.</p>
<p>Your suggestions for Expos&eacute; are good, and I think even practicable. It needs to be said, though, that any widespread revolutions in GUIs will be the result of evolution, not revolution. As a society we&#8217;re just as attached and just as dependent on the static window model as on gasoline-powered engines. Sure, some geeks like multiple desktops in Linux, and it may be objectively better, but you can say the same thing about hydrogen cars. Also, consider that while we may be tired of static windows, most of the world is still getting the hang of them. There&#8217;s still plenty of usability issues to be worked through before the model is mature and ready to be supplanted.</p>
<p>Perhaps a good analogy is the bike; a fancy Cannondale today looks very little like the first bikes, but I can still look at either and know how to start working with it immediately, because I learned how to ride &#8216;a&#8217; bike, and therefore by extension any bike. That kind of universal generalized expertise is very valuable and discarded at our peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
