<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Escher&#8217;s Birthday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/eschers-birthday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/eschers-birthday/</link>
	<description>selling my soul, but keeping a copy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:51:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/eschers-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthurthefourth.com/?p=39#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Hmm...how embarassing.  Although every other link I looked at says June 18th, the one I actually linked to says June 17th.  I guess that&#039;s why Google had the image up at 11:48 PM last night.  So which one is it, folks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;how embarassing.  Although every other link I looked at says June 18th, the one I actually linked to says June 17th.  I guess that&#8217;s why Google had the image up at 11:48 PM last night.  So which one is it, folks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: echillri</title>
		<link>http://arthurthefourth.com/2003/06/eschers-birthday/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>echillri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arthurthefourth.com/?p=39#comment-8</guid>
		<description>All gone now. That&#039;s kinda sad. Though I guess there&#039;s something worth commemmorating almost every day, and Google has to have at least a little consistency with its logo. If not using the &#039;wacky&#039; logo for the whole day means they do more of them I suppose it&#039;s a good thing. From a graphic design perspective they&#039;re very interesting; there should be a gallery of them somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All gone now. That&#8217;s kinda sad. Though I guess there&#8217;s something worth commemmorating almost every day, and Google has to have at least a little consistency with its logo. If not using the &#8216;wacky&#8217; logo for the whole day means they do more of them I suppose it&#8217;s a good thing. From a graphic design perspective they&#8217;re very interesting; there should be a gallery of them somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

